Events

  • 9:00am-12:20pm(JST)

2024-25 Rising Stars in Market Design

We will host an international workshop “2024-25 Rising Stars in Market Design” presented by young researchers on the 2024-2025 academic job market on November 26 (JST).

Event Information

Date & Times: 9:00am – 12:20pm, Tuesday, November 26 (JST)
Venue: Zoom online (pre-registration system)
Language: English
*Please refrain from taking pictures, recording audio and video, or reproducing any content presented during the event.
*Please do not share the Zoom joining URL with a third party.

About registration

There is no registration fee, but pre-registration is required.
Please sign up through the form below.

Even if you have registered for our workshops or conferences in the past, we kindly ask you to re-register this time as we are using a new meeting URL.

Deadline: 12:00pm, Monday, November 25th, 2024 

Sign Up

Program

TimeSpeakerTitle
9:00-10:00am

Ermis Soumalias 
(University of Zurich)

Truthful Aggregation of LLMs with an Application to Online Advertising
10:10-11:10am

Kei Ikegami
(New York University)

Bargaining over Leasing Contracts amid Shifting Power Balance
11:20am-12:20pmLea Nagel
(Stanford University)
As-If Dominant Strategy Mechanisms

*All times are Japan Standard Time.

Speaker

Ermis Soumalias 
(University of Zurich)

Title: Truthful Aggregation of LLMs with an Application to Online Advertising
 
Abstract: The next frontier of online advertising is revenue generation from LLM-generated content. We consider a setting where advertisers aim to influence the responses of an LLM to align with their interests, while platforms seek to maximize advertiser value and ensure user satisfaction. The challenge is that advertisers’ preferences generally conflict with those of the user, and advertisers may misreport their preferences. To address this, we introduce MOSAIC, an auction mechanism that ensures that truthful reporting is a dominant strategy for advertisers and that aligns the utility of each advertiser with their contribution to social welfare. Importantly, the mechanism operates without LLM fine-tuning or access to model weights and provably converges to the output of the optimally fine-tuned LLM as computational resources increase. Additionally, it can incorporate contextual information about advertisers, which significantly improves social welfare. Through experiments with a publicly available LLM, we show that MOSAIC leads to high advertiser value and platform revenue with low computational overhead. While our motivating application is online advertising, our mechanism can be applied in any setting with monetary transfers, making it a general-purpose solution for truthfully aggregating the preferences of self-interested agents over LLM-generated replies.

Kei Ikegami
(New York University)

Title: Bargaining over Leasing Contracts amid Shifting Power Balance
 
Abstract: This paper presents a model where contract renewals and terms are negotiated based on past performance, which influences renewal through two channels: altering the bargaining environment and shifting the power balance between parties. Applied to shopping mall leasing contracts, my analysis reveals that fluctuations in the balance of bargaining powers alter the mall’s share of surplus by 10%. Controlling for bargaining power enables a clearer identification of contract term determinants. Notably, the mall managers’ risk preferences affect contract selection, with the potential to double rental income by changing the managers under the same power balance with the tenants.
JEL Classification Codes: C71; C78; L81; R32; R33.
Keywords: Contracting; Nash Bargaining; Renegotiation; Shopping Center; Tenancy; Tenant.

Lea Nagel
(Stanford University)

Title: As-If Dominant Strategy Mechanisms
 
Abstract: We show that achieving dominant strategy incentive compatibility often requires to choose a mechanism which severely limits what agents can observe about others’ previous moves. However, experiments and theoretical arguments suggest increasing the transparency of a mechanism’s extensive form can improve reliability of its predictions—even if it breaks the dominant strategy property. To help resolve this dilemma, we define as-if dominant strategy mechanisms: (i) Each agent has at least one strategy that becomes dominant if the others were restricted to behave as if the mechanism was static, and (ii) all combinations of such strategies are ex-post equilibria. These mechanisms look like a dominant strategy one to cognitively limited agents who neglect others may condition their behavior in sophisticated ways, and can help them avoid dominated behaviors. Moreover, they ensure sophisticated agents never have an incentive to deviate. Our framework rationalizes the auction format chosen by prominent online platforms, such as eBay. It also provides a unified explanation for experimental evidence in various settings. Further, we provide sufficient conditions for as-if dominant strategy mechanisms to also be weak dominance solvable.

Contact info

The University of Tokyo Market Design Center(UTMD)
Graduate School of Economics, the University of Tokyo
E-mail: market-design[at]e.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Phone: (+81)3-5841-3441